Assignment Paper

Familiar with American common law especially contract and property. I would like to pay high fee for this.

PRO-CON ESSAYS

For Part II of the Final Exam, you must choose to answer either Pro-Con Essay #1 or Pro-Con-Essay #2. You will have 60 minutes (one hour), from 1:00pm-2:00pm, to complete your essay choice. Do not attempt to answer both essays (you won’t have enough time). You must select and answer only one of the Pro-Con Essays as your submission for Part II of the exam, and I will only grade your first essay. Please indicate clearly at the beginning of your essay which essay you choose to answer.

Pro-Con Essay #1

Citing to and elaborating upon three cases we’ve studied and discussed during the course from the Case List provided on the day and time of the exam (Thursday, May 14 at 1-2pm), and strictly following the Rules for Writing, make as strong an argument as you can in the form of a persuasive essay in which you AGREE OR DISAGREE with the statement below. Your essay will be proportionally graded on how well you formulate the issue in each case you select, how well you summarize the rule and reasoning supporting the rule and any relevant exceptions to the rule in each case you select, how well you lay out the court’s analysis in each case you select, how well you state the conclusion of the court in each case you select and how well you have used each case you select to support your argument, pro or con.

Judges should be strictly bound to follow well-established property law precedents, even if they personally feel that times or circumstances have changed and that injustice or bad law might result from adhering to the principle of stare decisis (“Let the decision stand;” the policy of common law courts to abide by or adhere to principles established by decisions in earlier cases).

Pro-Con Essay #2.

Citing to and elaborating upon three cases we’ve studied and discussed during the course from the Case List provided on the day and time of the exam (Thursday, May 14 at 1-2pm), and strictly following the Rules for Writing, make as strong an argument as you can in the form of a persuasive essay in which you AGREE OR DISAGREE with the statement below. Your essay will be proportionally graded on how well you formulate the issue in each case you select, how well you summarize the rule and reasoning supporting the rule and any relevant exceptions to the rule in each case you select, how well you lay out the court’s analysis in each case you select, how well you state the conclusion of the court in each case you select and how well you have used each case you select to support your argument, pro or con.

Judges should always favor the principle of grantor sovereignty (carrying out the grantor’s intent) over free alienability (making sure the property is marketable and free from unreasonable restraints on alienability) in deciding property rights cases.

cases
Pierson v. Post
Popov v. Hayashi
Moore v. Regents
Intel Corporation v. Hamidi Graduate
Johnson v. McIntosh Graduate
Howard v. Kunto Graduate
Gruen v. Gruen Graduate
Cole v. Steinlauf
Moore v. Phillips
Murphy v. Financial Development Corporation
Duncan v. Vassaur
State ex rel. Thornton v. Hay
Neponsit Property Owners’ Ass’n v. Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank
Sanborn v. McLean
Shelley v Kraemer
Boomer v. Atlantic
Spur and Prah
Euclid v. Ambler
Kelo v. City of New
Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon
Penn Central Station v. New York City
Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Commission
Commonwealth Building Corp. v. Hirschfield
Blackett v. Olanoff
Javins v. First National Realty Co.
Walls v. Oxford Management Co.
Problem of the Day
Foundation Development Corporation v. Loehmann’s Inc.
Merchants Row Corp. v. Merchants Row Inc.
quarian Foundation v Sholom House