Assignment Paper

Assessment item 5 – Presentation
TASK
Assessment Task 3 builds on Assessment Task 2.
Assessment Task 3 is an oral presentation.
• key points of the Family Violence Prevention Program that you examined in Assessment Tasks 2;
• key points of your SWOT; and
• a recommendation derived from the SWOT for a prevention and promotion activity appropriate for the community in which the Program was implemented. This recommendation would include an explanation of:
o the nature of these prevention and promotion activity; and
o how you would ensure the community engaged with the prevention and promotion activity.
In your presentation, you are expected to:
• engage with a digital medium to present your work to your peers (e.g. use MS PowerPoint or Prezi);
• ensure your presentation is audience appropriate; and
• engage with the audience.
RATIONALE
SUBJECT LEARNING OUTCOMES
This assessment task will assess the following learning outcome/s:
• be able to critically evaluate strategies for best practice when working in the area of sexual assault, family violence and associated trauma.
• be able to discuss the principles underpinning effective partnerships with community agencies when planning initiatives to address sexual assault, family violence and associated trauma.
• be able to respond appropriately and effectively to issues of sexual assault family violence and associated trauma at a beginner practitioner level.
• be able to lead community based education, workshops and provide in partnership mental health services in a professional manner.
CRITERIA HD (85 – 100) DI (75 – 84.5) CR (65 – 74.5) PS (50 – 64.5) FL (0 – 49.5) MARK
Gave a presentation to peers, at Residential School, within designated time-frame (10 minutes) using MS Powerpoint, or equivalent, providing information on:
• key points of the Family Violence Prevention Program that you examined in your SWOT;
• key points of your SWOT; and
• a recommendation derived from the SWOT for a prevention and promotion activity appropriate for the community in which the Program was implemented. This would include an explanation of:
o the nature of the prevention and promotion activity; and
o how you would ensure the community engaged with the prevention and promotion activity
Appropriately referenced Sophisticated, well-researched and highly organised presentation.
Undertaken in designated time-frame (10 minutes).
Used MS PowerPoint or equivalent, highly effectively.

Examined and synthesised all relevant points outlined in Criterion 1.
Referenced using APA at an outstanding standard.
(Range 21.5-25)
Comprehensive and well-researched presentation

Went slightly over the designated time-frame (by 1 minute).

Used MS PowerPoint or equivalent, effectively.

Explained all relevant points outlined in Criterion 1.

Referenced using APA at an excellent standard.
(Range 19-21) Generally well-researched and detailed presentation

Went over the designated time-frame (by 2 minutes).

Used MS PowerPoint or equivalent to good effect.

Described all relevant points outlined in Criterion 1.

Referenced using APA at an excellent standard.
(Range 16.5-18.5) Satisfactory presentation

Went well over the designated time-frame (by 5 minutes).

Used MS PowerPoint or equivalent but required additional practice and development.

Clearly outlined all relevant points outlined in Criterion 1.

Referenced using APA at an excellent standard.
(Range 12.5-16) Presentation not satisfactory, not well researched and disorganised.

Went well over the designated time-frame (by 10 minutes).

Used MS PowerPoint or equivalent, but to a low standard.

Did not clearly outline all relevant points outlined in Criterion 1.

Did not reference OR did not use APA.

(Range 0-12) /50
Demonstrated capacity for oral presentations based on the following criteria:
• Audibility
• Pace
• Fluency
• Tone and Energy
• Eye Contact
• Body Language and Gesture
• Appropriateness to the audience
• Structure and cohesion of information
• Slides not ‘crowded’, easy to read, and enhanced presentation. Demonstrated an outstanding capacity for oral presentations based on the following criteria:

•Audibility;
•Pace;
•Fluency;
•Tone and Energy;
•Eye Contact;
•Body Language and Gesture;
•Appropriateness to the audience;
•Structure and cohesion; and
•Slides not ‘crowded’, easy to read, and enhanced presentation.

(Range 21.5-25) Demonstrated an excellent capacity for oral presentations based on the following criteria:

•Audibility;
•Pace;
•Fluency;
•Tone and Energy;
•Eye Contact;
•Body Language and Gesture;
•Appropriateness to the audience;
•Structure and cohesion; and
• Slides not ‘crowded’, easy to read, and enhanced presentation. (Range 19-21) Demonstrated a good capacity for oral presentations based on the following criteria:
•Audibility;
•Pace;
•Fluency;
•Tone and Energy;
•Eye Contact;
•Body Language and Gesture;
•Appropriateness to the audience;
•Structure and cohesion; and
Slides not ‘crowded’, easy to read, and enhanced presentation.

(Range 16.5-18.5) Demonstrated a satisfactory capacity for oral presentations based on the following criteria:

•Audibility;
•Pace;
•Fluency;
•Tone and Energy;
•Eye Contact;
•Body Language and Gesture;
•Appropriateness to the audience;
•Structure and cohesion; and
• Slides not ‘crowded’, easy to read, and enhanced presentation.

(Range 12.5-16) Capacity for oral presentations requires development, based on the following criteria:

•Audibility;
•Pace;
•Fluency;
•Tone and Energy;
•Eye Contact;
•Body Language and Gesture;
•Appropriateness to the audience;
•Structure and cohesion; and
• Slides not ‘crowded’, easy to read, and enhanced presentation. (Range 0-12)