The aim of the individual assignment is to develop your skills in communicating how
organisations can define performance. You will prepare a report explaining and justifying how
you define ‘performance’ (or ‘success’) for one of the six organisations listed in this document.
In completing this assignment, you will engage in analysis and self-evaluation exercise, which
help you learn how to turn the rough ideas you have in your draft into a high-quality and
professional final report. This assignment assesses both the quality of your final report and your
process in producing it.
What does ‘performance’ mean for… ?
Prepare a report addressing this question, focusing on one of the following Australian
organisations/subsidiary, or a business unit within that organisation (i.e., focus on the
operations in Australia):
Bunnings Nuheara Ltd.
Police Bank The a2 Milk Co. Ltd.
The Reject Shop Xero Ltd.
Objectives:
This task relates to the following subject objectives:
Critically analyse the institutional, organisational and individual influences on
management accounting systems
Form professional judgments about the appropriateness of the design and operation of
management accounting systems
This assessment also enables the evaluation of the following program objectives:
Convey information clearly and fluently in high quality written form appropriate for their audience (3.1)
Weighting and marks:
30% (30 marks) of total result for the subject:
Draft report: 3 marks
Final report: 20 marks
Self-evaluation exercise: 7 marks
© UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY 2
Individual assignment components
This assignment contains three components:
1) Draft report:
The draft report must have a minimum of two pages of writing and a minimum of three
references, preferably peer reviewed journal articles. This is to ensure that you have a decent
draft to work on for the self-evaluation exercise.
Penalty applied to draft reports that are shorter than two pages.
High similarity score will attract misconduct investigation conducted by the Academic
Service Unit.
2) Final report (20 marks in total for substantive content and structure):
Your report will be assessed against four (4) criteria, which are contained in the marking
rubric. It is up to you how you structure your report.
1. Organisational analysis. Your report should briefly introduce the organisation and then
provide a clear overview of the organisation’s objectives, strategies and key activities (i.e.,
corporate, competitive and operational strategies), and structure. Make sure you introduce
your organisation in your own words – do not merely copy what the organisation says on
its website.
2. Performance definition (i.e., key performance aspects). Your report should provide a
clear recommendation explaining the most important aspects of performance for your
chosen organisation or a business unit of the organisation. In other words, the report should
provide readers a clear understanding of what ‘success’ means for this organization or the
business unit. Keep in mind that the focus is to define performance, rather than measuring
performance. Make sure you include both the obvious aspects of performance related to the
key operations of the business as well as other aspects of performance that support these
operations. For example, if you believe financial performance is a key aspect of the
performance, you should also identify other key performance aspects leading to financial
performance, such as innovation, production efficiency, etc.
To identify the key performance aspects of the organisation, you need to interpret and
critically evaluate the information you have, that is, you need to judge whether the
information indicates the most important aspects of performance, or it is a marketing means
to legitimise the organisation’s operations (do not include it in your report). In many cases,
better assignments show in-depth analysis of the organisation and include aspects of
performance that are not mentioned on the website (and justify why it is included – see next
point).
© UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY 3
3. Justification of performance aspects. You should persuade the readers that the
performance aspects that you identified are appropriate for the organisation/business unit.
In the justification you should refer to your organisational analysis, relevant academic
literature or other materials that support your definition of performance. A good
justification should show a strong connection with academic literature (i.e., journal
articles).
4. Written communication. Your report should be well written so that it is easy to read and
understand, well structured so that it is coherent, logical and well sequenced, and well
presented so that it is professional, polished and appropriate for its audience. It should
conform to the specified formatting requirements and the UTS Business referencing
conventions.
Remember, performance is shaped by what you define as an organisational unit. The
performance of a whole organisation is very different from the performance of a business
unit, an operational department, or a project team. Therefore, be sure to specify the level of
the organisation for which you define the performance, and ensure that the performance is
relevant to it.
Word limit:
The report is to be no more than 1200 words in length. Following the formatting requirements
below means you should carefully check the word limit if your report exceeds 3 pages. See the
table below for what is included in the word limit.
Report Structure:
Your report must be structured as a brief report. For instructions about writing reports, please
see The UTS Business School Writing Guide available in the assessment folder on Canvas.
Your report should include (or omit) the following sections:
Section Required? Included in
word limit?
Title Page Not required. Your report should have the ‘MDC Individual report final
submission cover sheet’ attached at the end of this document.
No
Short
Executive
Summary
Given the short length of the report we expect this section to be a few
sentences. Remember an Executive Summary is written in past tense and
summarises the findings of a report (which is different to an essay
introduction which introduces what the essay will cover).
Yes
Table of
contents
Not required. Don’t include
in report
Introduction One short paragraph where you introduce your organization. If you
choose to focus on a business unit of the organisation, then you should
also provide information on the business unit.
Yes
© UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY 4
Body of the
report
The body of the report should include sections with headings, that is, use
headings to structure your report so that the main points covered in each
section is clear to the audience. The quantity of the headings is up to
you. Use the key point of each section to name your headings. There is
no requirement to have a Discussion and/or Recommendations sections.
Yes
Conclusion Not required. Given the report is only 1200 words, no conclusion
paragraph is necessary. Your executive summary will incorporate your
conclusion.
Don’t include
conclusion
paragraph
References All information sources must be acknowledged using the APA 7th
referencing style for both in-text citations and the reference list at the
end of the report. The reference list at the end of the report should only
include all in-text citations in your report.
Please refer to the library website to ensure you reference correctly:
https://www.lib.uts.edu.au/help/referencing/apa-referencing-guide
An excellent quick tutorial with examples of referencing can be found
here: https://avoidingplagiarism.uts.edu.au/
Submissions that contravene the referencing policy may draw severe
penalties or be referred to the Student Misconduct Committee.
Reference list
not included
in word limit
Appendices Not required. All content must be in the body of the report. Don’t include
in report
Formatting of report body:
Font: Times New Roman, 12pt
Line spacing: 1.5 line spacing
Margins: At least 2cm for top, bottom, left and right margins
Include page numbers in your report
Research
You are expected to undertake independent research, reading a variety of sources to learn
about your chosen organisation/business unit as well as techniques for how we could define
performance. The materials we cover in lectures are a useful starting point; however, you are
expected to find other sources relevant to your report. Think carefully about what sources you
would like to use in your report. We prefer that you engage with a smaller set of relevant peer-
reviewed academic sources in a meaningful way, rather than superficially referring to a larger
group of sources. The following website has some great information about the types of
academic sources of information that you are expected to use in your report:
https://www.uts.edu.au/current-students/current-students-information-uts-business-
school/study-and-assessment-resources-1
3) Self-evaluation exercise report (7 marks):
The self-evaluation exercise (SEE) is designed to help you think about ways in which you can
improve your report so that you produce a polished, professional, persuasive final report. You
will focus mainly on your written communication. Through improving how you communicate
https://www.lib.uts.edu.au/help/referencing/apa-referencing-guide
https://avoidingplagiarism.uts.edu.au/
https://www.uts.edu.au/current-students/current-students-information-uts-business-school/study-and-assessment-resources-1
https://www.uts.edu.au/current-students/current-students-information-uts-business-school/study-and-assessment-resources-1
© UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY 5
your ideas, you will also improve, refine and develop the ideas.
Between the submission of your draft report in Week 4 and the submission of the final report
in Week 6, we expect you to conduct a self-evaluation of your draft report. We encourage you
to perform the following steps multiple times during the writing process so to improve the
quality of your report. Additional to the three steps, we also encourage you to utilize a writing
tool to assist you, such as AcaWriter (developed by UTS Connected Intelligence Centre),
Grammarly, and the like.
1. Referencing review
2. Formatting checklist
3. Peer feedback
In Week 6 you will need to submit the filled SEE report together with the relevant
supporting materials attached, including the annotated similarity report, the draft report
with peer’s comments.
The template for the SEE report is available on Canvas.
Due dates and submission timetable:
What Where When
1) Draft
report
submission
Complete a 2-page draft report
and a reference list (cover
sheet not required)
Online (Turnitin)
“Individual report draft”
on Canvas
By 5:00pm Thursday
26 August 2021
(week
4)
2) Final
report
submission
Complete final report (with
cover sheet)
Online (Turnitin)
“Individual report final”
on Canvas
By 5:00pm Thursday
9 September 2021
(week
6)
3) SEE
report
submission
Self-evaluation exercise report
(with supporting documents)
Online
“Self-evaluation exercise
report” on Canvas
By 5:00pm Thursday
9 September 2021
(week
6)
Further instructions:
The assignment submission is Turnitin-enabled. Similarity check will be conducted for
both your draft report and final report.
You must complete this assessment independently. Students who are found copying or
submitting work that is not their original work will be referred to the student misconduct
committee and subject to harsh penalties.
You should avoid sharing your draft and final report with other students to minimise
the risk of engaging illegitimate cooperation.
© UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY 6
For more information on academic misconducts, please visit Rule 16.2 via
https://www.gsu.uts.edu.au/rules/student/section-16.
Late submission penalties:
The Accounting Discipline Group enforces the following assignment late submission policy:
Take-home assignments submitted after the due date without approval from the subject
coordinator or an approved special consideration application will be penalised 10% of the
total assignment mark for each calendar day in which the assignment is late. A calendar day
is defined as 24-hour period or part thereof following the published due date and time of the
assignment. This rule applies until the 5th calendar day in which the assignment is awarded
a zero mark (to a minimum mark of zero).
For example, if the assignment is worth 30 marks and it is submitted 2 days late without an
approved special consideration. The student will have 6 marks deducted from their
assignment score. If they score 26/30, then their adjusted mark will be 20/30.
Specifically, students who do not conform to the submission timeline will incur the following
penalties:
1) Draft report submission in Week 4: Zero will be awarded to late submission (after 5pm
26 August). The submission time is the time Turnitin records once the document has
uploaded. During peak assessment periods, upload time can take a while. You are
therefore advised to submit your assignment well in advance of the time due.
2) Final report submission in Week 6: 3-mark (10%) penalty for every day late will be
applied to final report mark.
3) SEE report submission in Week 6: 3-mark (10%) penalty for every day late will be applied to self-evaluation exercise mark with a maximum of 7 marks.
Feedback and Marking
You will receive different types of feedback relating to your report, including Turnitin reports
(about similarities), peer feedback, completed marking rubrics and grades from your tutor.
Pre-submission
The self-evaluation exercise encourages you to make use of other sources of feedback on your
earlier drafts (e.g., peers and self-review, writing tools). Since this process is central to the
assessment exercise (you will be receiving marks for doing this), you are expected to complete
your report without substantive input from MDC teaching staff before the final submission.
If you have general questions about the assessment requirements, please ask your subject
coordinator at weekly lectures or on the dedicated forum – Discussion Board on Canvas.
https://www.gsu.uts.edu.au/rules/student/section-16
© UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY 7
Final submission marking
Your tutor will mark both your final report and SEE report according to the criteria specified
in the marking rubric. We strongly recommend that you familiarise yourself with the
marking rubric well in advance, and develop your report to address the criteria. The teaching
staff will moderate the marking in an effort to ensure consistency in marking across the classes.
Final submission feedback
You will receive feedback on your report in Week 8, which includes a grade, as well as a
completed rubric showing how your submission is assessed according to the marking criteria.
Marking queries, reviews and appeal process
If you have any questions concerning the feedback or marking, you need to discuss this with
your tutor within 2 weeks after receiving the feedback. Your tutor will advise you of the next
steps in the review process. The two-week timeframe applies to the entire MDC cohort.
NOTE: one of the requirements of the review process is that students review and reflect on the
feedback provided (i.e., highlight how your self-assessment differs from your tutor’s assessment
using a separate marking rubric).
Exemplar assignments
To give you a sense of what makes a ‘good’ assignment, we provide examples of past students’
work on Canvas under the Assignments tab. Please note that assignment requirements, the list
of organisations, and components do change over time. The examples show how previous
students had done well in meeting the previous requirements but may not be equally relevant
to the current assignment.
Specifically, this semester’s assignment is structured as a report, whereas some of the exemplar
assignments were required to be structured as an essay. While the exemplars are not perfect,
they have demonstrated convincing justification of their arguments, which is one of the main
criteria of a good quality assignment.
Each semester we try to update this collection by including new examples of students’ work.
We do this by reviewing and selecting outstanding, creative or innovative examples from the
most recent submissions, de-identifying and making minor changes to the work (if necessary),
then publishing it online. We will contact the author of the work to ask their permission for use
before making it available online.
© UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY 8
MDC Individual Report Cover Sheet
Student name:
Student number:
Student email:
Tutor name:
Tutorial time:
Date submitted:
Report word count:
Report
organisation:
SUBMISSION CHECKLIST (please read, tick and sign)
Final report structure and content
Report has short Executive Summary, introduction and body paragraphs with headings
Large blocks of text have been broken up into paragraphs
All statements of fact have been referenced
Minimal use of direct quotes – ideas should be paraphrased in your own words Format
Times new roman 12 pt font, Line spacing 1.5, Margins: at least 2 cm for top, bottom, left and right margins, page numbers.
Referencing – APA 7th
Number of academic journal articles in reference list
Number of other sources in reference list
All direct quotes have page or paragraph numbers in their in-text citations
All and only in-text citations have been included in the final reference list
Final reference list is in alphabetical order by author/year/2020a, 2020b etc SEE report
SEE report is submitted to Canvas
Supporting evidence for SEE is attached to the SEE report
I hereby certify that this assignment is my own work, based on my personal study and/or
research and that I have acknowledged all material and sources used in the preparation of this
assignment. I also certify that the assignment has not previously been submitted for
assessment and that I have not copied in part or whole or otherwise plagiarised the work of
other students or authors
Signed:
© University of Technology Sydney
22421 Management Decisions and Control – Spring 2021
Student Name:
Marking Rubric – Individual Report Grade: /20
Marking component Exceeds criteria Meets criteria Criteria not yet met
Organisational analysis Report provides a clear, comprehensive, succinct
analysis of the organisation’s/business unit’s
objectives, strategies, structure and activities.
Report provides an overview but needs a clearer
analysis of the organisation’s/business unit’s
objectives, strategies, structure and activities.
Report does not provide a clear analysis of the
organisation’s/business unit’s objectives, strategy,
structure and activities. This may be because the
objectives/strategies have been copied from the
organisation without critical analysis.
Defining
performance for your
organisation
Provides a valid, clear, insightful explanation of
the most important aspects of performance that
have been tailored specifically for the
organisation.
Provides a valid general explanation of some
aspects of performance that are relevant to the
organisation.
Does not provide a convincing explanation of aspects
of performance, and/or the aspects of performance are
vague, unclear, generic or irrelevant to the
organisation.
Justification of your definition of performance
Provides a clear, persuasive justification of each
aspect of performance that is appropriate for the
chosen organisation. Convincingly links the
justification of each performance aspect to the
organisational analysis. Demonstrates deep
engagement with relevant academic sources to support discussion.
Provides a justification for most aspects of
performance that is appropriate for the
organisation. Provides some link between the
justification of performance and the organisational
analysis. Uses relevant academic sources to
support main points of discussion.
Does not provide a clear, persuasive justification of
each aspect of performance that is appropriate for the
chosen organisation. Does not convincingly link the
justification of each performance aspect to the
organisational analysis. Does not use or uses minimal
relevant academic sources, or engages with them
superficially.
Written communication Communication is concise and precise. Report is
very well written, structured, and presented in a
professional and coherent manner. Minimal
grammatical/ spelling/ punctuation errors.
Rich and reliable sources are used to inform the
analysis. The APA 7th referencing style is applied consistently with no errors. The formatting and word count are strictly adhered to (does not exceed the word limit).
Communication is generally clear, making it easy
for the reader to understand. Report is written,
structured, and presented in a neat and appropriate
manner. Some grammatical/ spelling/ punctuation
errors.
A few reliable sources are used to inform the
analysis. The APA 7th referencing style is applied
consistently, with a few errors. The formatting
and word count is mostly adhered to (up to 10%
over the word limit).
Communication of report is unclear making it difficult
for the reader to understand the ideas being presented.
This may be the result of errors in written
communication, imprecise language, and/or poor
structure. Many grammatical/ spelling/ punctuation
errors.
Minimal or no reliable sources are used to inform the
analysis. The APA 7th referencing style is applied
incorrectly (with many errors). The formatting or word
count is not adhered to (more than 10% over the word
limit).
Self-evaluation Exercise Report Grade: /7
1. Referencing review /2
2. Formatting and structuring /2
3. Peer feedback /3
For this short paper activity, you will learn about the three delays model, which explains…
Topic : Hospital adult medical surgical collaboration area a. Current Menu Analysis (5 points/5%) Analyze…
As a sales manager, you will use statistical methods to support actionable business decisions for Pastas R Us,…
Read the business intelligence articles: Getting to Know the World of Business Intelligence Business intelligence…
The behaviors of a population can put it at risk for specific health conditions. Studies…